Congruency of Student’s Perception about Balanced Role of Family and School in Religious Education: a Phenomenological Research

Document Type : Scholarly Article

Authors

1 MA degree in Educational Psychology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant professor of the Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor of the Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

This research is about the role of family and school in religious education and student’s perception about congruency of the two. Qualitative research method in general and phenomenology in particular has been used. For this purpose, 18 female high school students have been selected through targeted selection until saturation. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview and the obtained data were analyzed using Smith's method. All information has been grouped in four categories in terms of the role of family and school in religiousness, congruence/conflict among them, student’s strategies in the face of conflict and a suggested solution to promote congruency. The Positive role of family includes pragmatic ideal, attraction of family participation and flexibility in practicing religious rituals and negative role of family includes passiveness in religious education and family conflicts. Effectiveness of the role of school was related to the ability of teachers, flexibility and respect in their behavior. But its destructive effect was related to violent behaviors, discrimination and enforcement without convincement. The congruency of family and school consist a wide spectrum which starts from a complete congruency up to a difference in educational methods and beliefs. The goals of the two have also wide variety. The result of the congruence is persistence of religious belief in students and the result of the conflict is student’s confusion, forcing to choose one side and deviation from the designed rout towards religiosity. In terms of strategies, three methods of law-abiding, accompanying the family and choosing the optimal path were observed. In order to promote congruency, three strategies were proposed which are better knowledge of the characteristics of students, better interaction between family and school, and encouragement of students.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abedi Jafari, Hassan, Taslimi, Mohammadsaeid, Faghihi, Abolhasan and Sheikhzadeh, mohammad (1390). Tahlil mazmun va shabake mazamin: raveshi sadeh va karamad baraye tabyin olguhaye mojud dar dadehaye keyfi. Andisheh modiriat rahbordi, sal 5, payiz va zemestan 1390, shomare 2. 151-198.
Alamolhoda, Jamileh (1398). Islamic Theory of Human Development. Tehran: entesharat Beheshti Un.
Bagheri, Khosro, Sajjadieh, Narges and Tavassoli, Tayebeh (1389). Roykardha va raveshhay pazhohesh dar falsafeh talim o tarbiat. Tehran: nashr pazhoheshkadeh motaleat farhangi va ejtemae. Noskheh electronic dar narmafzar fidibo.
Bahonar, Nasser (1387). Media and Religion; from Islamic Traditional Media to Television. Tehran: Markaz tahghighat seda va sima jomhuri Islami Iran.
Bahonar, Nasser (1392). Din, resane o koodak. Tehran: ettehadie radio & television haye Islami.
Bakhshizadeh, Mohammad Hosein, Ansarian, Fahimeh, Bahonar, Nasser and Samadi, Masoomeh (1400). Thinking training based on Islamic ontology based on Allameh Tabatabai’s point of view. Faslnameh tahghighat bonyadin olume ensani, sale 7, shomare 25: 47-68.
Gill, David, Adams, Bridget (1384). ABC of Communication Studies. (Ramin Karimian, motarjem), Mehran Mohajer and Mohammad Nabavi. Tehran: markaz motaleat va tahghighat resaneha.
Hall, Stuart (1382). Encoding and Decoding. Motaleate farhangi. (Shahryar Vaghfipoor and Nima Malek, motarjem). Tehran: pajuheshhaye sima
Hall, Stuart (1387). Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Dar nazariehaye ertebatat: mafahim enteghadi dar motaleat resanei va farhangi. (Saeidreza Ameli, Sarvirastar). Tehran: pajuheshkade motaleat farhangi va ejtemaei. 300-365.
Littlejohn, Stephen (1384). Theories of Human Communication. (Seyyed Morteza Nurbakhsh va Seyyed Akbar Mirhassani, motarjem). Tehran: Jangal.
Mahdizadeh, Seyyed Mohammad (1391). Nazariyehaye resaneh: andishehaye rayej va didgah enteghadi. Tehran: Hamshahri.
McQuail, Denis (1385). Daramadi bar nazarie ertebat jamei. (Parviz Ejlalil, motarjem). Tehran: daftar motaleat va tosee resaneha.
McQuail, Denis (1387). Audience Analysis. (Mahdi Montazeqaem, motarjem). Tehran: daftar motaleat va towsee resaneha.
Mohammadpur, Ahmad (1392). Ravesh tahghigh keifi zed ravesh (j1). Tehran: jamee shenasan.
Nowzari, Mahmood (1380). Bayesteha asasi pajoohesh dar talim va tarbiat Islami. Ravesh shenasi olum ensani, dore7, shomare28: 34-51.
Sadreddin Shirazi, Mohammad ebn Ebrahim (1383). Alshavahed alrobubiah. (Mohammadjavad Mosleh, Motajem). Tehran: Soroosh.
Sadreddin Shirazi, Mohammad ebn Ebrahim (1981). Alhekmat Almotaaliye (j4). Beirut: Daro ehya attorath alarabi.
Tabatabaei, Mohammadhosein (1375). Almizan fi tafsir alQoran (j5). Qom: moassese nazar Islami.
Tabatabaei, Mohammadhosein (1387). Resale alvelaye (majmue rasael). Qom: markaz chap o nashr daftar tablighat Islami.
Tabatabaei, Mohammadhosein (1390). Nahayat alhekma. Qom: moassese nashr Islami.
Tabatabaei, Mohammadhosein and Motahari, Morteza (1386). Osul falsafeh va ravesh realism (j1 va j2). Tehran: Sadra.
Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammadhosein (1374). Tafsir Almizan (j2). Qom: daftar entesharat jamee modarresin.
Hall, S. (1997). Encoding/Decoding. In: P. Marris and S. Thornham. Meda Studies: A Reader, 41-49.
Taylor, L.; and Willis, A. (1399). Media Studes: Text, Institution and Audiences. Blackwell Puilcation.
Wendy, H.; and Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research Differently, Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method. London: Sage