Self‑Cultivation as a Moral Duty: An Analysis from the Perspective of Islamic Moral Philosophy

Document Type : Scholarly Article

Authors
Hamid Zangeneh 1
Sayyed Jalal Hashemi 2
Sayyed Mansour Maraashi 3
1 PhD Student in Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
10.30497/esi.2026.249152.2012
Abstract
Introduction
In Islamic moral philosophy, self-cultivation is not merely a recommended spiritual practice or an auxiliary stage in the individual’s moral and religious development. Rather, it constitutes one of the most fundamental moral duties of the virtuous agent and serves as a central mechanism through which ethical excellence is realized. The present article, drawing upon anthropological and epistemological foundations of the Islamic tradition, argues that self‑cultivation is a reflective, intentional, and teleological process in which the human being, through regulating the faculties of the soul, refining volitional capacities, and reorienting motives and goals, becomes capable of embodying moral virtue. The core problem addressed in the study is the conceptual status of self‑cultivation within the broader structure of Islamic ethics and the question of how it may be explicated as a foundational moral obligation. Accordingly, the principal aim of the study is to undertake a conceptual reconstruction of self-cultivation as understood in the classical Islamic corpus and to propose a coherent framework for explaining its relationship to virtue formation and moral perfection. The guiding question of the inquiry may be stated as follows: Upon what philosophical foundations does self-cultivation rest in Islamic ethics, and what conceptual components are required to analyze its structure and moral function?
Literature Review
Within the Islamic intellectual and spiritual tradition, the discourse of self‑cultivation possesses a long and rich background. It is commonly discussed under the headings of tazkiyah (purification of the soul), tahdhīb (moral refinement), mujahadah (spiritual striving), and the well‑known concept of jihad al‑akbar (the greater struggle). Classical scholars—from Qur’anic commentators and moral theologians to Muslim philosophers and mystics—have consistently emphasized the indispensability of inner purification and moral discipline. Nonetheless, much of this literature presents self‑cultivation in prescriptive or pedagogical terms, and less frequently as a concept subjected to systematic philosophical analysis in its capacity as a moral duty. The novelty of the present study lies in its attempt to articulate self‑cultivation not merely as a set of personal spiritual exercises, but as a structural condition of moral personality, inseparably linked to the agent’s capacity for responsibility, virtue, and ethical discernment. As such, the article positions itself within contemporary scholarship that explores the relation between self‑knowledge, moral education, and human perfection, while going further to reconstruct the internal logic of self‑cultivation as a normative and conceptual construct within Islamic ethics. This analytic framing enables a more precise formulation of how self‑transformation functions as a moral requirement and how it shapes the agent’s readiness for ethical action.
Methodology
The study employs a transcendental–conceptual analytical method, allowing for the examination of foundational concepts at the level of their underlying premises, logical implications, and internal relations. Rather than providing a historical or descriptive account of ethical teachings, the author undertakes a philosophical reconstruction aimed at identifying the normative architecture of self‑cultivation. Through this method, the article revisits the widely recognized triad of tazkiyah, tahdhīb, and jihad al‑akbar and reformulates it into a more analytically robust, five‑component framework designed to capture the dynamic and multi‑layered nature of self‑cultivation. These five components are: (1) Profound Self‑Awareness, (2) Meaningful Goal‑Setting, (3) Authentic Self‑Belief, (4) Growth‑Oriented Self‑Criticism, and (5) Adaptive Self‑Guidance. Each of these is treated not merely as a psychological disposition but as a moral capacity necessary for the agent’s progression toward virtuous character. The transcendental analysis thus functions to reveal the conditions under which moral agency, inner reform, and virtue acquisition become possible within an Islamic moral framework.
Findings
The study’s central finding is that self‑cultivation operates in Islamic ethics as a constitutive process of virtue realization and the formation of moral personality. Contrary to superficial interpretations that limit self‑cultivation to personal introspection or ritual spirituality, the article demonstrates that self‑cultivation plays a structural role in Islamic moral philosophy and is directly connected to the quality of moral agency. Within this conceptual framework, the human being is understood as possessing cognitive, volitional, and teleological dimensions; moral growth is contingent upon the harmonious development and alignment of these dimensions.
The first component, Profound Self‑Awareness, forms the epistemic foundation of moral transformation by enabling individuals to recognize their existential condition, moral status, and ultimate purpose. Meaningful Goal‑Setting then provides ethical orientation, preventing fragmentation in decision-making and grounding actions in a coherent moral trajectory. Authentic Self‑Belief strengthens volitional resolve and empowers the agent to undertake difficult moral reforms. Growth‑Oriented Self‑Criticism ensures continuous self‑evaluation and correction, functioning as an ethical safeguard against stagnation and self‑deception. Finally, Adaptive Self‑Guidance facilitates the sustainability of moral development by enabling the agent to respond constructively and flexibly to changing life circumstances and moral challenges. Taken together, these components reveal that self‑cultivation serves not only personal growth but also the establishment of a stable moral identity that underlies ethical responsibility and social engagement.
Discussion and Conclusion
The article argues that Islamic ethics cannot be fully understood without acknowledging self‑cultivation as a central and indispensable dimension of moral life. Ethics, in this sense, is not merely a system of duties and prohibitions but a comprehensive project of shaping the self –one that aims to cultivate a morally coherent agent capable of embodying virtue in both personal and social contexts. By revisiting the classical tradition through a conceptual‑analytic lens, the article shows that terms such as tazkiyah and tahdhīb ultimately point toward a guided and purpose‑driven process of self‑transformation whose goal is the flourishing of the human being and the actualization of moral potentialities.
Accordingly, self‑cultivation should not be regarded as a peripheral or purely spiritual matter but recognized as a core ethical obligation that structures the moral life of the agent. The proposed five‑component framework offers a theoretically grounded model that can inform both philosophical analysis and the development of practical approaches in Islamic moral education. It emphasizes that sustainable moral growth requires the integration of self‑awareness, intentionality, confidence, critical self‑examination, and continuous guidance. In closing, the study highlights the intrinsic link between individual virtue formation and social moral responsibility, presenting a more holistic vision of Islamic ethics as a teleologically oriented system concerned with both inner perfection and outward moral engagement.
Keywords
Keywords: Self-formation
moral duty
Islamic moral philosophy
virtue-centered education
Spiritual Development
educational model
Subjects

این مقاله برگرفته از رسالة دکتری با عنوان «بررسی تحلیلی خودسازی به‌مثابة وظیفة اخلاقیِ کنشگر فضیلت­مند و تبیین دلالت‌های آن در تعلیم و تربیت» دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز است.

References
The Holy Qur’an.
Baghgoli, H., & Ghanavi, A. (2019). A critique of the theory of Islamic education: A reconsideration of Islamic education under critical examination. Research on Issues of Islamic Education, 43, 5–26. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22516972.1398.27.43.1.3 [In Persian]
Bagheri, K., with the collaboration of Sajjadiyeh, N., & Tavassoli, T. (2010). Approaches and Methods of Research in Philosophy of Education. Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. [In Persian]
Biruni-Kashani, R. (2018). Identifying the components of students’ moral education: Establishing correspondence between character education theories and the Islamic education approach. Educational Sciences from the Perspective of Islam, 6(11), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.30497/edus.2018.71498 [In Persian]
Boyd, R. (1983). Humility and self-awareness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 20(2), 113–121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20014174
Damon, W. (1996). Greater expectations: Overcoming the culture of indulgence in our homes and schools. New York, NY: Free Press.
Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Journal of Management Review, 70, 35–36. https://community.mis.temple.edu/mis0855002fall2015/files/2015/10/S.M.A.R.T-Way-Management-Review.pdf
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.
Fanaei Ashkouri, M. (2016). The stages of spiritual wayfaring in Islamic mysticism. Ma‘refat, 10(229), 13–26. https://marifat.nashriyat.ir/node/3173 [In Persian]
Fernández González, M. J. (2019). At the heart of virtue growth: “Self-of-virtue” and “virtue identity.” Estudios Sobre Educación, 36, 9–29. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.36.9-29
Feyz Kashani, M. b. Shah Morteza. (1994). Al‑Safi fi Tafsir al‑Qur’an (Ed. H. A‘lami, Vol. 3, p. 391). Tehran: Maktabat al‑Sadr. http://noo.rs/S46lr [In Persian]
Ghaffari, A., & Bagheri Nouparast, K. (2001). Virtue‑based moral education from David Carr’s perspective. Islamic Studies, 53–54, 157–184. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/64181 [In Persian]
Gilbert, P. (2010). Compassion focused therapy: Distinctive features (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851197
Haghi, A., Safaei‑Moghaddam, M., Marashi, M., & Hosseinzadeh, A. M. (2018). Examining the relationship between theory and practice in moral education based on Allameh Tabataba’i’s theory of i‘tebariyyat (constructivist notions). Journal of Islamic Education, 13(27), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.30471/edu.2018.1470 [In Persian]
Hashemi, S. J., Pak‑Seresht, M. J., Safaei‑Moghaddam, M., Sepasi, H., & Mehralizadeh, Y. (2010). Education for just and peaceful coexistence: Examining an educational objective. Educational Sciences, 17(1), 1–26. https://education.scu.ac.ir/article_10268.html [In Persian]
Hesari, Y., Heydari, M. H., Bakhtiar Nasrabadi, H. A., & Hashemi, S. J. (2025). An analysis of teachers’ character from the perspective of care ethics: Deriving educational principles. Educational Sciences, 32(1), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2025.48441.3690 [In Persian]
Hursthouse, R., & Pettigrove, G. (2023). Virtue ethics. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2023 ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/ethics-virtue/
Javadi Amoli, A. (2019). Mafatih al‑Hayat. Qom: Esra Publications. [In Persian]
Jahanipour, Y. (2005). Self-cultivation from the perspective of Imam Khomeini and a number of mystics (Part II). Hozour, 52. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/54309 [In Persian]
Kalbadi‑Nejad, A., & Ghadiri Javid, L. (2016). Examining Allameh Tabataba’i’s view on self‑knowledge and its relation to purification and ethics. Allameh Tabataba’i Studies, 5, 129–150. https://doi.org/10.22054/TAT.2017.8054 [In Persian]
Khazaei, Z. (2008). Virtue ethics and religious ethics. Ethics Research Letter, 1(1), 83–97. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/844310 [In Persian]
Khomeini, R. (2008). Purification of the Soul and Spiritual Wayfaring from the Perspective of Imam Khomeini. Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works. [In Persian]
Khomeini, R. (2009). Sharh‑e Chehel Hadith (Commentary on Forty Hadith). Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works. [In Persian]
Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development, Vol. II: The psychology of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
Kristjánsson, K. (2015). Aristotelian character education. London, England: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315752747
Lenman, J. (2000). Consequentialism and cluelessness. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29(4), 342–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00342.x
Lewin, L. O., McManamon, A., Stein, M. T. O., & Chen, D. T. (2019). Minding the form that transforms: Using Kegan’s model of adult development to understand personal and professional identity formation in medicine. Academic Medicine, 94(9), 1299–1304. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002741
Lucas, J. J., & Moore, K. A. (2020). Psychological flexibility: Positive implications for mental health and life satisfaction. Health Promotion International, 35(2), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz036
Lyons, K. E., & Zelazo, P. D. (2011). Monitoring, metacognition, and self-regulation. In E. Bialystok & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive neuroscience (Vol. 2, pp. 175–196). Oxford University Press.
Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306232
McKay, B. (2000). The difference between self-confidence and narcissism. [Article]. Retrieved from https://www.artofmanliness.com/character/advice/the-difference-between-self-confidence-and-narcissism/
Marashi, S. M., Cheraghian, J., Safaei‑Moghaddam, M., & Valavi, P. (2018). A comparative study of social thought in the ideas of Allameh Tabataba’i and Matthew Lipman and its implications for the Philosophy for Children curriculum. Applied Issues in Islamic Education, 3(1), 149–186. https://doi.org/10.29252/qaiie.3.1.149 [In Persian]
Mohammadi Ashnani, A., & Sajjadi Jazi, S. A. (2022). An analytical study of the components of Qur’anic self‑knowledge and its application in human development in Lady Amin’s Makhzan al‑‘Irfan commentary. Qur’an, Culture and Civilization, 3(2), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.22034/JKSL.2022.363101.1157 [In Persian]
Motahhari, M. (2003). Education in Islam. Tehran: Sadra Publications. [In Persian]
Motahhari, M. (2011). Spiritual Freedom. Tehran: Sadra Publications. [In Persian]
Najafi, H., Dehghan‑Kelvar, M. S., & Ghondagh‑Sazan, M. H. (2020). The role of monotheism‑orientation in moral education based on Allameh Tabataba’i’s perspective. Educational Sciences from the Perspective of Islam, 8(14), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.30497/edus.2020.75368 [In Persian]
Naraqi, M. M. (2002). Islamic Ethics: Translation of Jāmiʿ al‑Saʿādāt (Trans. J. Mojtabavi). Tehran: Hekmat. [In Persian]
Oettingen, G., Pak, H.-J., & Schnetter, K. (2001). Self-regulation of goal-setting: Turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 736–753. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.736
Papi, S., Hashemi, S. J., Valavi, P., & Safaei-Moghaddam, M. (2021). Presenting a Qur’anic model of desirable inner transformation in human beings using a textual grounded theory method. Epistemological Studies in Islamic University, 25(89), 1201–1216. https://doi.org/10.22034/KSIU.2022.1129 [In Persian]
Sadeghi Arzegani, M. A. (2021). Purification of the soul. In Encyclopedia of Imam Khomeini (Vol. 3, pp. 600–608). Tehran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works. [In Persian]
Seyedreza Doulabi, M. S., & Saeidi Hosseini, M. S. (2024). Content analysis of the concept of taqwa in the Holy Qur’an with emphasis on practical strategies in the process of self‑cultivation and self‑management. Religious Research, 49, 181–203. http://pdmag.ir/article-1-2175-fa.html [In Persian]
Seligman, M. E. P., & Peterson, C. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2023). Consequentialism. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2023 ed.). Stanford University.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/consequentialism/
Tabataba’i, S. M. H. (1996). Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism (Vol. 2, Essay 6). Introduction and annotations by M. Motahhari. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
Tabataba’i, S. M. H. (1999). Al‑Mizan: An Exegesis of the Qur’an (Vol. 20, Persian trans. by M. B. Mousavi Hamedani). Qom: Office of Islamic Publications, Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [In Persian]
Tousian‑Khalilabad, S., Beheshti, S., Shariati, S. S., & Ghaffari, A. (2023). Explaining the process of transcendent moral education based on Mulla Sadra’s interpretations. Educational Sciences from the Perspective of Islam, 11(22), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.30497/esi.2024.245104.1672 [In Persian]
Torkamani, H. A., & Bigdeli, R. A. (2015). The semantics of tazkiyah in the Holy Qur’an with an emphasis on its educational components. Educational Teachings in the Qur’an and Hadith, 1, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.22034/IUED.2015.18097 [In Persian]
Varghese, B. P. (2014). Do metaphysical beliefs manipulate moral competency? A study in the context of cultural diversities, involving global population. International Journal of Scientific Research in Knowledge, 2(7), 328–339. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2459324
Vejdani, F., Imani, M., Akbarian, R., & Sadeghzadeh Qamsari, A. (2012). The innate foundations of ethics in Allameh Tabataba’i’s theory and the educational principles derived from it. Research on Issues of Islamic Education, 15, 9–28. https://iej.ihu.ac.ir/article_200822.html [In Persian]
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

  • Receive Date 23 October 2025
  • Revise Date 08 February 2027
  • Accept Date 15 April 2026
  • First Publish Date 15 April 2026
  • Publish Date 21 March 2026