Principals' Sensemaking in the Path of Fundamental Reform Document of Education Implementation

Document Type : Scholarly Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of the Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D in Educational Administration, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor of the Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor of the Department of Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The implementation of the Fundamental Reform Document of Education (FRDE) has been one of the significant issues of the education system in our country in the last decade. FRDE, similar to all educational policies and reforms, is affected by the adaption process and is not necessarily implemented according to policymakers’ intentions.The aims of this study is to understand and explain the meaning made by school principals of their role during the implementation of FRDE and investigates how to implement the transformation document. This qualitative study was conducted using the phenomenology method and based on the cognitive framework of sensemaking. Data was gathered through semi-structured and in-depth interviews with 8 public high school principals in four district 3, 6, 7, and 13 of Tehran. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data analysis method of Miles et al. (2014) led to the formation of three main theme categories “ambiguty”, “documentary”, and “individual and situational factors”. Finding illuminates, the ambiguity of FRDE’s text and how it is transitioning to practice. The requirement to act in such a situation leads principals to make another sense of their role and they perceive themselves as documenters. In light of the findings, forming this meaning was affected by individual factors including same-old and to-no-avail attempts, as well as situational factors including the extent of applying, rules and regulations, and value position. According to the findings, despite the efforts made to implement the FRDE in schools, the main purpose of the implementation of it has not been achieved. The attention of policymakers to the factors that shape sensemaking can help in designing educational policies and more effective implementation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Akhlaghi, A., Saleh Sedgh Pour, B., & Navid Adham, M. (2020). Future study of the Fundamental Reform Document of Education Implementation: The 2025 Perspective. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 10(34), 56-80.
Allen, C. (2020). The role of productive ambiguity in shaping teachers’ sensemaking and implementation of science education reform. 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Nashville, Tennessee, Volume 4 (pp. 1847-1854).
Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2015). Studying teachers’ sensemaking to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 136-149.
Aref, H., Seyyed Javadin, S. R., Pourezzat, A. A., & Mohammad Elyasi, G. (2019). Sensemaking: Concept Analysis and Implications for Human Resource Management. Journal of Public Administration, 11(3), 509-529.
Bakhtiari, L., & Dehghani, M. (2022). A Study on the Researches of the Education Fundamental Reform Document of Islamic Republic of Iran: Meta-analysis Study. Islamic Perspective on Educational Science, 10(19), 5-47.
Baniasad, S., Hossein Gholi Zadeh, R., & Khandaghi, M. A. (2018). From Effectiveness to Excellence: Gap between Theory, Research and Practice in the School Management Excellence Program. Foundations of Education, 7(2), 124-148.
Bell, L., & Stevenson, H. (2006). Education policy: process, themes and impact (Abolghasemi, M., & Fathi Vajargah, K.). Tehran: Noor alsaghalain.
Bitarafan, F. S., Sojoodi, M., & dehghani, M. (2021). Investigating the Implementation Barriers of the Fundamental Evolution Education Document Based on the Fullan Model: Case Study of The Field of Aesthetic and Artistic ducation. Research in Curriculum Planning, 17(67), 90-110.
Boutorabi, S. B., Hosseingholizadeh, R., & Mahram, B. (2019). Realizing the characteristics of school organizational structure in the Fundamental Reform Document of Education (FRDE) in the Islamic Republic of Iran. School Administration, 7(2), 273-303.
Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational policy, 19(3), 476-509.  
Ericson, T. (2001). Sensemaking in organisations—towards a conceptual framework for understanding strategic change. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17(1), 109-131.
Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2019). School principals’ sense-making of their leadership role during reform implementation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(3), 279-300.
Gawlik, M. A. (2015). Shared sense-making: How charter school leaders ascribe meaning to accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 393-415.
Ghajari, N., Mazidi, M., Shamshiri, B. (2020). Understanding the Most Significant Challenges to Execution of the Document of Fundamental Transformation in the Education System of Iran; a Focus on Its Main Subsystems. Journal of Curriculum Research, 10(1), 1-33. 
Hill, K. L., Desimone, L., Wolford, T., Reitano, A., & Porter, A. (2023). Inside school turnaround: What drives success?. Journal of Educational Change, 24(3), 393-423.
Holmes, K., Clement, J., & Albright, J. (2013). The complex task of leading educational change in schools. School Leadership & Management, 33(3), 270-283.
Janger, M. I. (2006). How does reform happen? Sensemaking and school reform: An interpretive case study. University of Michigan (Doctoral dissertation).
Kezar, A. (2013). Understanding sensemaking/sensegiving in transformational change processes from the bottom up. Higher Education, 65(6), 761-780.
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57-125.
Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. (2010). Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of management studies, 47(3), 551-580.
Marsh, J. A., Bush-Mecenas, S., Strunk, K. O., Lincove, J. A., & Huguet, A. (2017). Evaluating teachers in the Big Easy: How organizational context shapes policy responses in New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 539-570.
Marzooghi, R., Aghili, R., & Mehrvarz, M. (2017). A Methodological and Theoretical Analysis and Critique of the Educational Fundamental Transformative Documents of Islamic Republic of Iran. Foundations of Education, 6(2), 21-40.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd
Mokher, C. G., Park-Gaghan, T. J., Spencer, H., Hu, X., & Hu, S. (2020). Institutional transformation reflected: Engagement in sensemaking and organizational learning in Florida’s developmental education reform. Innovative Higher Education, 45, 81-97.
Murphy, J. (2020). The Five Essential Reasons for the Failure of School Reforms. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 8(1), 1-17.
Navid Adham, M. (2012). Managerial Requirements of Fundamental Change in Education System. Strategy for Culture, 5(17-18), 295-323.
Potter, H. M. (2017). Principal Sensemaking in Implementation: How Perspectives Influence Outcomes. Michigan State University (Doctoral dissertation).
Reid, D. B. (2021). US principals’ sensemaking of the future roles and responsibilities of school principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 251-267.
Reid, D. B. (2023). US Traditional Public School Principals’ Sensemaking of Their Role as School Marketers. NASSP Bulletin, 107(1), 25-40.
Rigby, J. G. (2015). Principals’ sensemaking and enactment of teacher evaluation. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 374-392.
 Rostami Alileh, T., Namvar, Y., Sattari, S., & Rastgoo, A. (2020). Designing a Quality Process Model for Implementing School Management Excellence Program. Journal of School Administration, 8(2), 140-161.
Sadeghi Googheri, M., Yaghoubipoor, A., Montazeri, M. (2020). Analysis of effective factors on the realization of the document of fundamental transformation of education using fuzzy Demitel Method. The Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education, 15(3), 78-95. 
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2020). Sensemaking reconsidered: Towards a broader understanding through phenomenology. Organization Theory, 1(1).
Schechter, C., Shaked, H., Ganon-Shilon, S., & Goldratt, M. (2018). Leadership metaphors: School principals’ sense-making of a national reform. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(1), 1-26.
Malekipour Horjandi, E., & Sharifi, E. (2022). The Challenges Facing the Programs and Operational Guidelines of Fundamental Reform Document of Education in Schools’ Physical Education and Sport. Journal of Sport Management and Motor Behavior, 18(35), 80-61.
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of educational research, 72(3), 387-431.
Sutherland, D. H. (2022). School board sensemaking of federal and state accountability policies. Educational Policy, 36(5), 981-1010.
Tan, C. (2019). Sensemaking and sensegiving in schooling reform: South Korea and China. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 17(4), 536-547.
Taylor, K., Zarb, S., & Jeschke, N. (2021). Ambiguity, uncertainty and implementation. International Review of Public Policy, 3(3: 1).
Thomson, P., & Hall, C. (2011). Sense-making as a lens on everyday change leadership practice: The case of Holly Tree Primary. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(4), 385-403.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization science, 16(4), 409-421.
Young, T., & Lewis, W. D. (2015). Educational policy implementation revisited. Educational policy, 29(1), 3- 17.
Yurkofsky, M. (2022). From compliance to improvement: How school leaders make sense of institutional and technical demands when implementing a continuous improvement process. Educational administration quarterly, 58(2), 300-346.
Zahariadis, N., & Exadaktylos, T. (2016). Policies that succeed and programs that fail: Ambiguity, conflict, and crisis in Greek higher education. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 59-82.
Zaman Nejad, H., Daneshfard, K., Azghandi, S. A., & Tavasoli Roknabadi, M. (2023). A Basic Model of Sustainable Development Decision-Making in Education Policy (an Approach to Improve Productivity). The Journal of Productivity Management, 17(64), 223-248.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics